Haley Terei Wiki

Haley Terei, a mother of four, is at the center of a legal controversy in Victoria. She was granted bail earlier this year on eight charges related to a high-value burglary in Hastings, where she allegedly stole firearms, cash, and other valuables. Terei claimed to be an Aboriginal woman of the Yorta Yorta nation, citing her mother’s death and subsequent cultural disconnection. However, recent revelations exposed this claim as false, leading to the revocation of her bail. Her case highlights the complexities and potential abuses of Victoria’s bail laws designed to reduce the incarceration rates of Aboriginal people.  Born on , 1992, Haley Terei hails from Melbourne, Australia. As in 2025, Haley Terei's age is 33 years. Check below for more deets about Haley Terei. Learn more about Haley Terei facts, biography, age, birthday, trivia and more.


Haley Terei Profile:

Stage NameHaley Terei
Real NameHaley Terei
Profession(s)
Birthday, 1992
Zodiac SignCapricorn
Age33 years
GenderFemale
BirthplaceMelbourne, Australia
HometownMelbourne, Victoria, Australia
NationalityAustralian

Haley Terei Family

Father:Not Available
Mother:Not Available
Brother(s):Not Available
Sister(s):Not Available

Family and Personal Life

  • Haley Terei‘ father’s name is Not Available and Haley Terei‘ mother’s name is Not Available.

Haley Terei Trivia

  • Haley Terei was born in Melbourne, Australia.
  • Haley Terei’s birth sign is Capricorn.
  • Who is Haley Terei? Haley Terei allegedly lied about being Aboriginal to avoid jail under Victoria’s lenient bail provisions for indigenous people.
  • Charges and Bail Grant: The Supreme Court of Victoria granted Terei bail in May and June on eight charges stemming from a lucrative burglary. She is charged with stealing seven firearms, ammo, $470,000 in cash, gold nuggets, and other valuables from a residence in Hastings, south-east of Melbourne, in December.
  • Affidavit and Cultural Heritage: Terei claimed in an affidavit that she was an Aboriginal woman of the Yorta Yorta nation. She stated her cultural heritage had been ‘whitewashed’ by her father following the death of her Aboriginal mother when she was three.
  • Prosecution’s Objection: Prosecutors opposed her bail, arguing she was a risk to the community and might access the stolen firearms.
  • Judge’s Decision: Justice Rita Incerti released Terei, citing new bail laws that aim to reduce the incarceration rates of Aboriginal people. The judge noted Terei’s desire for cultural support to turn her life around and acknowledged her significant personal struggles
  • Revelation of the Truth: In court, it was revealed that Terei’s claim of Aboriginal heritage was a lie. A police officer monitored her phone calls while she was in prison, revealing her supposedly dead mother is not Aboriginal but alive and living in New Zealand.
  • Revocation of Bail: Terei’s bail was revoked, with Justice Incerti admitting the deceit was troubling. The judge stated that Terei falsely claimed Aboriginality to benefit from section 3A of the Bail Act.
  • Evidence Against Terei: Prison phone recordings provided strong evidence that Terei is not an Aboriginal person. She sought to gain a benefit in the bail application by falsely identifying as an Aboriginal person.
  • Arrest Warrant and Charges: A warrant was issued for Haley Terei’s arrest, and she faces charges of perverting the course of justice, which carries a maximum sentence of 25 years in prison.
  • Bail Reforms and Recommendations: The bail reforms aim to reduce the incarceration of Aboriginal people. These reforms were recommended by the coronial inquest into Veronica Nelson’s 2020 death in custody. The Parliamentary Inquiry into Victoria’s criminal justice system also supported these reforms.
  • Opposition’s Concerns: Opposition spokesman Michael O’Brien said some criminals might exploit the new bail laws. He raised concerns about how courts should handle claims of Aboriginal heritage, which rely on the honesty of those claiming such ancestry.
  • Justice Incerti’s Stance: Justice Incerti believes the current system, where the accused asserts their Aboriginal heritage without objective evidence, is adequate despite the deceit in this case. He sees no reason to change the process or require applicants or their legal representatives to provide more evidence of Aboriginality beyond their statements.

Official Sites